Re: lug-bg: Nesto po dobro ot Shaper ?

[stoev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Julian Stoev)]

Viz
http://www.lwn.net/1998/1119/shaper.html

Ne se otkazvaj ot shaper-a tolkova lesno.
Tam pishe:
"Advanced use of the traffic shaper could involve the use of IP alias
interfaces and fancy routes to impose limits on traffic to specific
sites. There is also a patch by Mike McLagan on ftp.linux.org which
allows setting point to point routes which allows even more
fine per-host control of bandwidth use with the traffic shaper."

--JS

On Wed, 27 Oct 1999, Nikolay Kabaivanov wrote:

> Zdrawejte 
> Az sum nowak w Unix a susto taka i w mailing lista no ste se radwam ako
> niakoj mi otgowori na wuprosa po podrobno :
> Iskam da ogranicha skorostta na wruzka na klienti kum edna mashina s
> niakolko ethernet-a.
> Celta e niakoj IP adresi da minawat prez nesto kato shaper, obache
> modula shaper raboti s interfejsi ne s whodiasti IP adresi. Niakawi idei
> kak da stane taka che klienta X makar i po Etherenet da ima dostup
> primerno 2 KB ?
> Blagodaria Wi predwaritelno
> BYE 
> ----------------------------------
> Nikolay Kabaivanov, ntk@xxxxxxxxxx
> University of Rousse, BG-7017
> ==================================================================
> A mail-list of Linux Users Group - Bulgaria (bulgarian linuxers)
> 

==================================================================
A mail-list of Linux Users Group - Bulgaria (bulgarian linuxers)