|
|
Re: lug-bg: Note:modules without a GPL compatible licence cannot use GPLONLY_symbols
- Subject: Re: lug-bg: Note:modules without a GPL compatible licence cannot use GPLONLY_symbols
- From: danchev@xxxxxxxxx (George Danchev)
- Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2001 12:16:02 +0200
On Tuesday 13 November 2001 11:25, you wrote:
> ot http://kt.zork.net/kernel-traffic/kt20011029_139.html#1
>
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL
Edin moment sega,
zna4i vyprosa mi e _STROGO_ tehni4eski, oba4e ne mozhah da namerq
reshenie/obqsnenie sledvajki tozi link.
Zna4i imam :
kernel_image1 - kompiliran ot 2.4.10 source (unmodified)
kernel_image2 - kompiliran ot 2.4.10 source patched s ext3 patcha.
Kak se polu4ava taka 4e kernel_image1 load-va bez nikakvi grizhi kernel
modula NVdriver, a kernel_image2 otkazva poradi licence pri4ini...
Pak povtarqm imam syotvetno compiled NVdriver v :
/lib/modules/2.4.10
/lib/modules/2.4.10patched
kernel_image2 otkaza da link-ne kojto i da e ot tqh s gorespomenatiq NOTE: ...
Ta tehni4eski kak ediniq kernel_image spazva tezi licence preventions, a
drugiq ne .. sled kato razlikata mezhdu tqh e edinstveno i samo ext3 patcha
???
Tova mi e vyprosa ...
A ne dali na kernel developerite im haresva ili ne nqkoj da polzva tehnite
interfejsi za da pravi binary only modules. Tova e druga tema koqto ne mislq
da diskutiram ...
Ako nesto ne sym razbral molq izvinete me, mozhe bi s dumi po-prosti ste
shvana :) .
10x
--
Greets,
fr33zb1
===========================================================================
A mail-list of Linux Users Group - Bulgaria (bulgarian linuxers)
http://www.linux-bulgaria.org/ Hosted by Internet Group Ltd. - Stara Zagora
|
|
|