Re: lug-bg: glibc 2.2.4

[mmarkov@xxxxxxx (Minko Markov)]

George Danchev wrote:
.....
> az li nerazbrah nesto ? No neka neostavat nedorazumeniq .... i nqkoj da
> izreve po-kusno 4e polzva takiva symlinks kym tekustoto kernel source.
> Vsustnost sled kato ste generirali kernel headers prehvurlete gi v _dir_ v
> /usr/include .... stoto kato si smenite kernel source-to naj-veroqtno ste
> imate problemi.
> eto zasto:
> http://www.uwsg.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0007.3/0587.html

Interesno. No vse pak, Linus govori za sluchaite, kogato se updateva
kernela, a libc si stoi takava, kakvato e doshla s distroto:

        In short, the _only_ people who should update their /usr/include/linux
        tree are the people who actually make library releases and compile their
                                                                   ^^^^^^^^^^^^^
        own glibc, because if they want to take advantaged of new kernel
        ^^^^^^^^^
        features they need those new definitions.

Ako si nyamash rabota i updatevash bibliotekata sled vseki major kernel update,
problem nyama da ima. :)


--
Minko
===========================================================================
A mail-list of Linux Users Group - Bulgaria (bulgarian linuxers)
http://www.linux-bulgaria.org/ Hosted by Internet Group Ltd. - Stara Zagora