Re: lug-bg: glibc 2.3.x � gcc 3.2

[danchev@xxxxxxxxx (George Danchev)]

On 24 10 2002 18:41, Îãíÿí Êóëåâ wrote:
> George Danchev wrote:
> > ne razbrah zasto e noviq compiler samo (gcc 3.2 ili ?)
>
> Â òàçè íèøêàòà íå çàáåëÿçàõ äà ñå ñïîìåíàâà gcc 3.2, íî glibc 2.3 ñå
> êîìïèëèðà ñàìî ñ gcc 3.2 èëè ïî-íîâ[1].
>
> [1] http://sources.redhat.com/ml/libc-hacker/2002-08/msg00119.html

zna4i trebe se uto4nqwame togava ;-) ako distroto predlaga precompled glibc 
2.3 packages, to gcc-3.2 ne e zadylzhitelno da go imame installed (mozhe i da 
e mozhe i da  ne e, on user demand, pak on user demand mozhe da e mozhe i da 
ne e default compiler-a v systemata, tuka vnimatelno s c++ code-to, i az 
obi4am da imat nqkolko gcc versions ;-). libc6 2.3 _ne_ depends on gcc-3.2 , 
no libc6 2.3 build-depends on gcc-3.2 ... i gcc-3.2 _ne_ depends on libc6 
2.3. 

za larry, v slu4aq ako squid se compile/link ve4e ok, to ne e kazano 4e ako 
imame glibc 2.3 x i compile somedanmcode.c linking s somedanmlib.a compeled 
against glibc 2.2.x  ste e OK ... mozhe i da izreve pak ld zaradi tez danm 
symbols ne exported on glibc 2.3.x ;-) 
ok, mislq 4e e qsno ;-)

-- 
Greets, fr33zb1 
[catching up with Sid (the boy next door who destroyed toys :-)]
[reg your bg translation or grab one from http://www.bgit.net/?id=37892]

============================================================================
A mail-list of Linux Users Group - Bulgaria (bulgarian linuxers).
http://www.linux-bulgaria.org - Hosted by Internet Group Ltd. - Stara Zagora
To unsubscribe: http://www.linux-bulgaria.org/public/mail_list.html
============================================================================